Mifid II, Solvency II most concerning for asset managers

Added 11th July 2016

Mifid II and Solvency II are the regulations asset manager think are most important this year, with data collection, enrichment and delivery identified as the most challenging areas.

Mifid II, Solvency II most concerning for asset managers

A straw poll of asset managers by data management provider Accudelta found that over half (52%) said that Mifid II was the most important regulation for their firm this year, with Solvency II coming in second with 26%.

With a raft of existing and upcoming regulation to address, many asset managers said that they are looking for ways to minimise the reporting burden associated with both pieces of regulation, with some looking to reuse reporting and regulatory data.

Mifid II

Adopted in 2007, the existing Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid) aims to improve the competitiveness of EU financial markets by creating a single market for investment services and activities, and ensuring a high degree of harmonised protection for investors in financial instruments, such as shares, bonds, derivatives and various structured products.

Mifid II, which was pushed back by one year, is expected to come into force in 2018.    

The updated regulation is intended to strengthen the protection of investors by introducing robust organisational and conduct requirements.

“Although fund managers have been given a slight reprieve from Mifid II, it seems that this regulation is still the main area of concern for asset managers across Europe."

It also aims to ensure that trading takes place on regulated platforms; introduces new rules on high frequency trading; improves the transparency and oversight of financial markets and will strengthen competition in the trading and clearing of financial instruments.

Reporting overlap

Oonagh O’Mahoney, senior vice president at Accudelta, said: “It has become clear that a common regulatory language is beginning to emerge allowing asset managers to identify overlaps between a number of regulatory reporting regimes.

“There has been considerable discussion about the potential overlaps between areas of the Priips (packaged retail and insurance-based investment products) regulation and aspects of Mifid II. It’s logical therefore for asset managers to leverage their efforts and look for overlap and reusable reporting data.”

Continued on the next page...

Visitor's Comments Add your comment

Add Your Comment

We won't publish your address

About Author

Kirsten Hastings

Senior Reporter

Kirsten is a senior reporter for International Adviser, covering global news stories about the financial services industry. She joined Last Word Media in October 2015 after two years working as a reporter covering the staffing and recruitment industry. Kirsten has a Masters in Financial Journalism from the University of Stirling. 


US equities: If you can’t beat them, join them

US equities: If you can’t beat them, join them...

European investors have been dismissing US equities as too expensive for a couple of years. But as the S&P 500 continues to outperform other equity markets, appetite for the asset class is again on the...


Ashburton International
Ashburton International

Ashburton Investments is a new generation investment...



Future Advisory Forum Hong Kong 2016
Future Advisory Forum Hong Kong 2016

Tuesday 4th October 2016

Hong Kong

Future Advisory Forum Singapore 2016
Future Advisory Forum Singapore 2016

Thursday 6th October 2016


Offshore Bond Workshop Manchester 2016
Offshore Bond Workshop Manchester 2016

12th October 2016
The Midland, Manchester

Future Advisory Forum Cape Town 2016
Future Advisory Forum Cape Town 2016

Tuesday 18th October
The Vineyard, Cape Town

Investment Strategy

Sponsored Content