Over 75% of UK advisers back ‘polluter pays’ FSCS levy

Added 7th October 2016

More than three quarters of advisers in the UK support the introduction of a risk-based Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) levy, according to a new survey from platform provider AJ Bell.

Over 75% of UK advisers back ‘polluter pays’ FSCS levy

Under existing rules, the FSCS levy is paid by advisers depending on the ‘fee blocks’ each firm belongs to, which are in turn determined by the type of activity that firm carries out such as life or pensions intermediation.

AJ Bell’s study, which asked almost 700 UK advisers whether the FSCS levy should be reformed, found that 78% agreed that a ‘polluters pay’ system should be adopted where those who transact the riskiest business would pay the most to fund the lifeboat scheme.

FAMR

Earlier this year, the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR), a joint review by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the UK Treasury into how to make advice easier to access, called for the regulator to look at risk-based levies to fund the FSCS.

 “Advisers are sending a message loud and clear to the regulator that the status quo, which often sees advisers with no complaints history whatsoever saddled with disproportionately huge FSCS levies, is no longer acceptable,” said Mike Morrison, head of platform technical at AJ Bell.

“Advisers have resoundingly backed the idea of a new levy model based on the risks of each individual advice firm. Moving to a ‘polluter pays’ system clearly has merits and we hope the FCA considers the views of those it regulates when deciding how to ensure the FSCS levy is fair and proportionate.”

FCA fines

Morrison also urged the FCA to help fund the FSCS, using the fines it collects, which are currently paid directly to the Treasury.

“In addition, it seems incongruous that all the fines paid by firms who are judged to have caused consumer detriment are funnelled out of the industry.  We’d like to see a proportion of those fines used to reduce the FSCS levy and reduce the cost of regulation for advisers. 

“This is one of the main barriers that gets in the way of a greater proportion of consumers having access to financial advice,” he said.

Afpa data

In August, a similar survey by the Association of Professional Financial Advisers (Apfa) found that nearly eight out of 10 (77%) UK advisers believe that product providers should contribute towards the cost of the FSCS levy on intermediaries.

Visitor's Comments Add your comment

Add Your Comment

We won't publish your address

About Author

Monira Matin

Senior Reporter

Monira joined International Adviser in March 2016 from Informa Global Markets where she worked as a eurobond reporter for over two years, covering fixed income markets. She has previously held a number of editorial positions covering politics, insurance and technology. Monira has a degree in Journalism and Economics from City University.

Features

Critical illness cover the next big opportunity for advisers

Critical illness cover the next big opportunity...Lock icon

Imagine your client owned a goose that laid a golden egg every month, says Chris Bagnall, chief underwriting officer and head of claims at Zurich International Life.

Analysis

Profiles

Directories

Canada Life International Limited
Canada Life International...

Canada Life International Canada Life House,...

Tweets

Events

IA International Portfolio Bond Forum Leeds 2017
IA International Portfolio Bond Forum Leeds 2017

Thursday 27 April
Thorpe Park Hotel, Leeds

IA Best Practice Adviser Awards UK 2017
IA Best Practice Adviser Awards UK 2017

3 May 2017
Waldorf Hilton, London

IA Product & Service Awards 2017
IA Product & Service Awards 2017

Wednesday 3 May 2017
The Waldorf Hilton, London 

IA International Portfolio Bond and Financial Planning Forum 2017

Sponsored Content

Investment Strategy

OTHER STORIES FROM LAST WORD...