bulletRELATED ARTICLES

 

bulletEDITOR'S PICKS

 

IoM QROPS provider BW Oakfield buys into Malta

From Retirement Apr 30 2012 @ 01:00

BW Oakfield Group, an Isle of Man pensions and QROPS provider, has acquired an IoM rival...
view article

World’s first in-depth study of the QROPs market

From Retirement Apr 27 2012 @ 11:07

Rex Cowley, principal of New Dawn Consultancy & Research is predicting a new playing field for...
view article


bulletRDR beneficiaries

 

Who will reap the greatest financial gains from RDR?



Simon Danaher

Hong Kong broker’s conviction for market manipulation overturned

From Asia Feb 6 2012 BY: Simon Danaher , Online News Editor , International Adviser

Add to My News Comments (0)

Print

Add to My News


A court in Hong Kong has overturned a broker’s conviction for market manipulation.

The Securities and Futures Commission said the Court of First Instance, part of Hong Kong’s High Court, allowed the appeal of former responsible officer of Guotai Junan, Pan Ming, and overturned his conviction for one offence of false trading under the Securities and Futures Ordinance.

One 1 March 2011, Ming was convicted of one count of market manipulation following an investigation by the SFC and was sentenced to five months imprisonment. He was also ordered to pay the SFC’s costs of HK$69,268 ($8,931, £5,660) within one month from the date of the court case.

Ming was charged with his client, an equity trader of a fund manager, who was charged with market manipulation and fraud offences but who has subsequently absconded from Hong Kong. A warrent for the trader’s arrest has been issued.

The SFC alleged that the client instructed Ming to fix a higher closing price for the shares of IRICO Group Electronics Co, a company listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The SFC further alleged that Ming agreed to carry out the instruction and directed his colleague to place five buy orders in the last two minutes of trading, two of them single board lots.

These orders were for a price higher than the prevailing market price. As a result, the IRICO share price closed 14% higher. The SFC alleged this was to facilitate a subsequent off-market transaction after market close, involving 15 million IRICO shares at a price higher than the closing price.
 

Add to My News Comments (0)

Add to My News Print

Add to My News

add to twitter

add to linkedin



COMMENTS


Have your say

(Be the first to) Have your say!

Please sign in or register here to leave a comment. Registration is free and only takes a few moments.





Follow us on Twitter

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Get the latest news

Join us on Linked In

SHARE ON LINKED IN
Inform your colleagues

Switch to our mobile site

SWITCH TO MOBILE SITE
News on the go

Back tot he top of the page

BACK TO TOP OF PAGE
Just click here...