Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Trump or Clinton – how should you position your portfolio?

8 Nov 16

Fund managers and fund selectors alike are haunted by the prospect of Trumpian rule, but still deem a Clinton victory more likely. However, it’s paramount investors don’t leave themselves too exposed to the consequences of a Trump triumph.

Fund managers and fund selectors alike are haunted by the prospect of Trumpian rule, but still deem a Clinton victory more likely. However, it's paramount investors don't leave themselves too exposed to the consequences of a Trump triumph.

When uncertainty rides high, gold is the safe haven of choice. So, to protect yourself against a ‘Trump dump’, it probably would make sense to include some of the yellow metal in your portfolio. That’s the solution to the US election dilemma that Tim Peeters’, head of securities portfolios at multi-family office Portolani in Antwerp, comes up with. Peeters has a very high allocation to the dollar, leaving him exposed to dollar weakness which would be the likely result of a Trump win.

“Overweights to both the dollar and gold could generate a decent return in both scenarios, if both assets are held in the right proportion,” says Peeters, who advocates a 1% allocation to gold for every 5% of dollar-exposure as the two are supposed to negatively correlate for any election outcome. “If Clinton wins, the dollar will outperform, while gold will if Trump triumphs. By allocating to both, the losses in one asset class can be made up for by gains in the other asset class,” he adds. “I have chosen a relatively high allocation to the dollar because I still see a Clinton victory as the most likely scenario.”   

Brexit memories

The trading pattern of the dollar has lately been conspicuously reminiscent of pound sterling’s fortunes before the Brexit referendum. The greenback weakened last week on news that the FBI was considering another batch of Hillary e-mails, and then strengthened when it emerged no new evidence had been found. A Trump triumph will therefore almost certainly lead to a market correction and a weakening dollar in the immediate aftermath of the vote. 

For Julian Marks, a global credit manager at Neuberger Berman and a British national, the current US election campaign indeed has a lot of parallels with the UK’s Brexit vote, the outcome of which he characterised as ‘a total shock’. “It was clearly negative as nobody knew, and still doesn’t know, what was going to happen. That’s what makes me so scared about this Trump situation,” he said, speaking at the Expert Investor Netherlands forum last week.

“If Clinton wins, the dollar will outperform, while gold will if Trump triumphs. By allocating to both, the losses in one asset class can be made up for by gains in the other asset class” - Tim Peeters

“Obviously I don’t want Trump to be elected. It’s the total unpredictability and it’s the question what it will do to world order and world stability that worries me most,” he added.

The experience of the Brexit vote, when most investors had been discounting a victory for the ‘Remain’ camp, has made them position themselves more cautiously this time.

David Karni, head of fund selection at the Italian bank BCC Risoparmio & Previdenza, has reduced his exposure to US equities in the run-up to the elections.

“The reason is the imbalance between the modest upside resulting from a Clinton victory versus the volatility in the short term if Trump wins. We don’t believe in the polls.” 

continued on the next page

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: Donald Trump | Hillary Clinton | US

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division

    Will inflation remain absent?

    Investment

    Bank of England set to stress test private markets

  • Dr Lisa Lim

    Asia

    Rathbones AM launches new Asia ex-Japan fund

    rachel-reeves

    Investment

    Kingsley Napley: High tax Budget hits middle classes more than high-net-worths


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.