Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Brits retiring early for ill health risk being hit by tax bill

By Cristian Angeloni, 29 Jan 20

As they could breach their annual allowance, Royal London found

People who are no longer able to work because of their health and are forced to retire early could receive a bill from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

According to mutual insurer Royal London, the hundreds of workers who are in this situation every year get a “significant overnight boost to the value of their pension rights”.

But this comes with consequences, as the extra sum is likely to breach the annual allowance for pension tax relief – landing workers with a penalty.

Royal London said some pension schemes treat people affected by ill health as if they had continued working from the date of early retirement up until pension age.

The additional pension rights from that assumed service are added in one lump, causing the income tax system to treat these cases as if they made a massive contribution in a single year.

Steve Webb, director of policy at Royal London, said: “Pension schemes do not hand out early retirement benefits lightly, and it seems very harsh to punish those who are in poor health with big tax bills.

“It is not the case that the workers who face these bills have been shovelling money into a pension in order to max out on pension tax relief.

“They have simply found themselves unable to do their job, often through no fault of their own, and it is quite wrong to saddle them with a large tax bill as a result.”

Caste study

The mutual insure said that, usually, workers within the public sector are most affected by this, but it could hit anyone who is forced to retire early due to their health.

Webb sent a freedom of information (FOI) request to the Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF) to understand how many of these cases happened in 2019.

The pension fund has a three-tier system to assess a member’s ill health and the contributions it would pay out.

  • Tier 1: when a worker is unlikely to be capable of carrying out gainful employment before normal pension age. Their contributions are calculated on the pension already built up, plus an ill health enhancement based on 100% of the pension they would have accrued between the early retirement date and pension age.
  • Tier 2: when a worker is not able to get gainful employment within three years of leaving, but are likely to be able to do so before the pension age. In this case, benefits are similar to Tier 1 but ill health contributions would total to 25% of the pension they would have built up from that date until normal retirement age.
  • Tier 3: when a worker is able to find gainful employment within three years of leaving. There will be no enhancement and benefits will only be based on the pension accrued up to the date of retirement.

GMPF said: “In the year 2018/19, [we] issued pension savings statements to 336 members in total.

“Of these, 10 members exceeded their annual allowance due to ill health retirement enhancements, all of which had tier 1 benefits.

“Six of those members were subject to a tax charge.”

The pension fund could not provide a breakdown or the sums paid by the six members as that would have exceeded the costs associated with FOI requests.

Tags: FOI | HMRC | Pension | Royal London

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

  • VIDEO: II Awards 2025 Winners’ Stories – Gareth Maguire, Hansard

    Companies

    VIDEO: II Awards 2025 Winners’ Stories – Gareth Maguire, Hansard

    Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.