Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

So why do advisers choose independence?

27 Jun 11

Sam Instone, of AES, shares the results of a recent survey of advisers into independence

Sam Instone, of AES, shares the results of a recent survey of advisers into independence

Our recent survey of 40 international advisory firms showed 38 (95%) claimed to be independent.  In the UK this means a company has terms of business with the whole of market and conducts a fair analysis based upon the clients needs.  What then does this entail in the international market, in the absence of any effective international comparison software, established product analysis process or even a clearly defined (both geographically and by product line) provider marketplace?

The answer is probably not so much whole of market independence for the client but an independence from banks, providers or larger distribution corporations so that advisers and advisory firms can manage their respective client banks in the way they choose best.

There’s no question that today’s international financial advisers have more options than ever before when it comes to determining practice affiliations, focus, and revenue models. Each option and route to market whether through insurance wraps, platforms or direct investment comes with pros and cons that must be carefully considered in line with a range of complex factors.

The 38 independent firms stated the reasons for choosing to focus on international business were as follows: –

32%     (12)      Autonomy to make own decisions
29%     (11)     More attractive revenue models
18%     (7)     Less Bureaucracy
16%     (6)     Disliked regulation
3%      (1)    Better Product Offering
3%     (1)    Technical Specialists in this area

This doesn’t give the textbook answer that independence delivers the best possible client outcomes.  However, it probably is a realistic reflection of adviser motivation.   Additionally, other benefits may be possible to achieve through independence rather than through the bank assurance, tied or other common distribution routes.
 

Adviser

Advisers Clients

·         An career  free from proprietary products, quotas and incentives

·         A diverse marketplace  that lets you choose your area of interest and expertise

·         Improved long-term definable revenue

·         Freedom to decide how to best service clients

·         Choose what, how and when to charge clients for services rendered

·         Ability to build and market your own brand

·         Ownership and value accrual of your own business

·         Access to business-building and succession-planning resources targeted to your specific needs

·         Greater confidence in objectivity and quality of advice received

·         Enhanced services and technology

·         More face time with and access to advisor; improved Communication

·         Fees potentially in line with services rendered; greater fee transparency

·         Elimination of ethical or financial concerns about firm or corporate parent

·         Confidence in advisor’s long-term commitment

·         Cost-effective fees and appropriately priced services

·         Increased product flexibility

·         Experience consistency in servicing even after advisor retires

No matter what the motivation— compensation, firm culture, quality of life, freedom to call your own shots—making a change requires extensive market research and no shortage of self-reflection. 

It is likely that the first steps to independence may be both difficult and a very sharp learning experience.  However, once established the freedom that independent status delivers should mean international advisers have the opportunity to make their own calls in line with both the best interests of their clients and themselves!
 

Tags: AES International | Sam Instone

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    SPONSORED: Real Regulation. Real Advice. Real Protection.

    Latest news

    A “best of both worlds” approach to financial fraud prevention

  • Latest news

    Pension IHT reforms will see clients and advisers face seismic shift

    Insights

    NEW: IA set to launch podcast and video series – ‘In the Loop’


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.