Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

ANALYSIS: Is timing now more important than time in the market?

By International Adviser, 8 Jul 16

In its latest Flow Show note, Bank of America Merrill Lynch pointed out that, at current rates, it would take you 1,387 years to double your savings in a 1-year German deposit account.

In its latest Flow Show note, Bank of America Merrill Lynch pointed out that, at current rates, it would take you 1,387 years to double your savings in a 1-year German deposit account.

If one took those savings to the relatively booming shores of the US, it would only take 107 years to double one’s investment in a similar vehicle, the firm points out.

At the same time, government bond yields are compressing ever closer to 0% and people are living longer, all of which adds up to a fairly challenging environment for investors and begins to beg the question, is it time to ditch the long-held adage: Time in the market is more important than timing the market?

Source: Rubrics Asset Management

For Steven O’Hanlon chief investment officer at Rubrics Asset Management, the answer is yes.

O’Hanlon argues that while returns are liable to be lower going forward across all asset classes, volatility is going to be higher and, as a result the timing of investments becomes crucial.

“Because the overall return looks very poor going forward, your entry point becomes more and more important. If the market is going up 10% a year, very little matters because the compounding impact of that covers up any mistakes that are made as a fund manager or an investor,” he told Portfolio Adviser.

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: BAML | Fidelity | Germany | JP Morgan

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • rachel-reeves

    Latest news

    UK Spending Review draws tax hike speculation – may be good for housebuilders, REITs

    Alternatives

    Industry reacts as Trump imposes tariffs across the globe

  • Investment

    Bank of England cuts base rate to 4.5% as ‘stagflationary thesis remains’

    Alternatives

    Geoff Cook on global trends amid Trump inauguration


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.