Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

ANALYSIS: Weighing up White House risk

By Kristen McGachey, 2 Nov 16

With less than a week to go before one of the most contentious presidential contests concludes, some market participants are ignoring the noise, but many are fretting over shocks to equity markets and the potential fallout from protectionist trade policies.

With less than a week to go before one of the most contentious presidential contests concludes, some market participants are ignoring the noise, but many are fretting over shocks to equity markets and the potential fallout from protectionist trade policies.

Both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 were looking the worse for wear this week. The former fell for its third consecutive month and the latter suffered its worst month since January. The Nasdaq Composite also lost much of the ground it gained in October on Monday.

However, Fidelity International multi asset CIO James Bateman predicts that the outcome of the election also has consequences for UK equities, particularly the constituents of the FTSE 100. “Around 75% of FTSE 100 earnings are denominated in US dollars, making the outcome of the Hillary versus Trump circus and the resultant impact on the US dollar a key question for UK investors,” he stated. “The more domestically focused FTSE 250 should be comparatively well shielded, though it is worth remembering that the US is still the UK’s largest export partner.”

In Bateman’s view, a Clinton presidency would pose greater risks for certain individual sectors like healthcare, which comprises over 11% of the FTSE 100 stocks. However, he sees Clinton as the “continuity candidate for dollar strength,” which would support globally exposed UK large caps.

“Over the medium to long term, we would likely see further dollar strength under a Clinton presidency, with the potential for more supportive fiscal policy to boost the economy and strengthen the case for tightening monetary policy,” said Bateman. “This would help to boost the US dollar against sterling, particularly if UK fundamentals weakened.

“More widely, a Democrat victory would also represent a broad continuation of the US’s global role,” he continued. “This would also be supportive for internationally exposed UK companies, particularly those with emerging market exposure, which rely on the relative openness on the international system.”

By contrast, President Trump would threaten wider risk-off moves in the immediate aftermath of the result and be the “short term nemesis” of dollar strength, said Bateman.

“It is hard to see how the dollar would not sell off in reaction to a Trump win, with his nativist sentiment and economic isolationism clearly detrimental to the US economy. Yet in the event of a Trump victory, UK investors would risk being on the losing side of a dollar-sterling battle for the ugliest currency award. While weaker sterling (and higher UK inflation) would undermine support for the domestically exposed FTSE 250, sterling strength would undermine the gains UK investors in the FTSE 100 have seen thus far,” he concluded. 

Pages: Page 1, Page 2, Page 3

Tags: Brexit | Donald Trump | Hillary Clinton | Tilney Smith & Williamson

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  

    Two businessmen successfully signed a contract

    Companies

    Wealthspire buys New Jersey RIA following merger

  • Equities

    Marlborough replaces investment manager on US Focus fund

    UBS incorrectly classified certain joint accounts as PI accounts when they should have been classified as non-professional investors’ accounts

    Companies

    UBS hires raft of new advisers across US


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.