Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Celebrities in firing line as HMRC looks to recoup

10 Mar 14

Celebrities including David Beckham and Andrew Lloyd Webber could face a bill of £1bn after a film scheme they invested in is accused of tax avoidance.

Celebrities including David Beckham and Andrew Lloyd Webber could face a bill of £1bn after a film scheme they invested in is accused of tax avoidance.

HM Revenue & Customs has questioned the legitimacy of Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP, which qualified for tax breaks under rules aimed at stimulating the British film industry, the Sunday Times reported.

Other names linked to the scheme include Gary Lineker, Bob Geldof, and Anne Robinson.

All involved have been asked to pay back any tax relief they received from the scheme, which demanded a minimum investment of £100,000, ahead of a tax tribunal scheduled for November.

The scheme was launched under the previous government and helped to fund films such as Life of Pi, Avatar and Girl with a Pearl Earring.

But HMRC argues these were not legitimate investments but were instead used to avoid tax.
Ingenious Media’s John Boyton sent a letter to clients saying HMRC had ‘draconian’ plans to force them to pay before the case goes to court.

HMRC’s actions form part of its measures to deal with a current backlog of 65,000 individuals and businesses suspected of tax avoidance.

As reported, these were last week criticised by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT).

The proposals link together similar cases, meaning a court ruling against one taxpayer will then apply to any “follower cases”.

CIOT president Stephen Coleclough said he accepted this as a temporary solution to courts “jamming up” but added that care should be taken before any wider use.

“Handing HMRC almost unprecedented executive powers to decide who falls within the mischief they intend to deal with, without the usual safeguards and appeal rights, is not something which should be done lightly,” he said.

“These emergency measures should not be a permanent state of affairs.”
 

Tags: HMRC

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

    Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%

  • Europe

    Hoxton Wealth: Two overlooked measures in UK Budget that could impact expats

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.