Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

China’s regulator zeroes in on fund performance fees

8 Jun 17

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has proposed new rules that require an asset management firm to inject at least RMB 10m (£1.16m, €1.33, $1.5m) into mutual funds that levy a performance fee.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has proposed new rules that require an asset management firm to inject at least RMB 10m (£1.16m, €1.33, $1.5m) into mutual funds that levy a performance fee.

The new guidelines, reported by China Fund News, the publication under the state-run People’s Daily, aim to align the interests, risks and returns of the fund manager and investors. 

In China, there are two common types of performance-based fee models. One type involves lowering fixed management fees for specified underperformance versus the benchmark while charging higher fixed fees for outperformance.

The second type strictly deals with outperformance. Investors provide a bonus to the fund manager if the fund outperforms to a specified target over the benchmark.

The regulator proposed several rules. An asset management firm has to seed any fund carrying a performance fee with RMB 10m ($1.5m) minimum. At least 10% of that should come from the portfolio manager.

Another proposed requirement is that all products that apply any performance fees need to have either an absolute return strategy or invest in bonds.

Overall annual charges of such funds cannot exceed 5%, the new guidelines suggest. The high watermark principle will be applied as well – a performance fee is charged only when the net asset value (NAV) outperforms the preset benchmark and only when the NAV is higher than the previous year.

There are also requirements for the fund managers. They should have at least five years of experience in equity or bond-related investment management.

If a manager receives an annual bonus, 30% of the bonus has to remain illiquid at least two years.

The proposed rules do not apply to the existing funds that charge performance fees, the report noted.

According to the report, there are 42 funds in China with performance fees. The products invest in several asset classes including equities, bonds, money market and multi asset.

Tags: China

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    FCA proposes new client classification rules to give more flexibility to wealthy investors

    Europe

    Fidelity International hires Santander AM CEO as new head of EMEA

  • Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.