Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

European Banking Authority eyes new investment firm rules

By Kirsten Hastings, 4 Nov 16

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking industry views on setting up a new prudential regime that is specifically tailored to the needs of investment firms.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking industry views on setting up a new prudential regime that is specifically tailored to the needs of investment firms.

The consultation, which runs until 2 February 2017, is looking for technical advice on developing a single, harmonised set of requirements that are reasonably simple, proportionate, and more relevant to the nature of investment business.

Risk rating

The EBA is proposing that the ongoing capital requirements should be calculated based on capital factors (K-factors) that are attributed to one of two broad types of risks; namely risk to customers and risk to market integrity and liquidity.

Therefore, firms that pose greater risk to customers and markets should have higher capital requirements than those that pose less risk.

Firms that pose similar risk to customers and markets but with more own risk should hold more capital than those with less own risk.

The discussion paper covers the most important aspects related to the new prudential requirements for investment firms, including three possible alternatives to set minimum liquidity requirements.

All three alternatives aim at addressing the liquidity profile of investment firms in a more appropriate way than the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the net stable funding ratio (NSFR).

Tags: Risk

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    FCA announces new rules for reporting on cyber-attacks and third-party incidents

    Investment

    House of Lords votes to scrap government power to mandate where pension schemes invest

  • Industry

    Inheritance tax on pensions gets the final green light despite industry pushback

    Asia

    UAE’s tax status reprieve for expats fleeing conflict not a panacea – Mishcon de Reya


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.