Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Expat ordered to pay for his ex-lover’s house

By Will Grahame-Clarke, 12 Sep 18

Love child born after ‘briefest’ fling and living with father

Love child born after ‘briefest’ fling and living with father

An American, who fathered a child with a British woman in the UK, has been told he must continue to pay for her housing, despite their child living with him in North America.

The case began with the “briefest of relationships” leading to a birth in 2014.

In early 2015, the father moved to work in Canada, while the courts decided the child’s residence and the financial arrangements for his maintenance.

The court decided the child would spend eight weeks at a time in England and four in Canada. The father was also told to pay £5,500 ($7,160, €6,160) a month and give £700,000 to buy a house for the kid and his unemployed mother. The dad would get the house back when the child reached 18 years of age.

Two years later, after concerns were raised over the mother’s ability to parent, another court decided it was best for the toddler to go and live with his father in Canada. He then applied to have the financial arrangements with the mother varied.

The England and Wales family court agreed the maintenance should be cancelled but he should pay for her accommodation, since the child still visited, but a smaller property was more appropriate. His capital contribution fell from £700,000 to £200,000.

Tags: Divorce | UK Adviser

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Avaloq and BTA Finance deal.

    Industry

    Brooks Macdonald appointed official wealth management partner of BAFTA

    Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

  • Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

    Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.