Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

hmrc claims 200m tax avoidance victories

20 Aug 12

HM Revenue & Customs has claimed a £200m tax avoidance victory today, after revealing details of three significant court cases it won last month.

HM Revenue & Customs has claimed a £200m tax avoidance victory today, after revealing details of three significant court cases it won last month.

The three cases all concerned what HMRC dubbed “aggressive” tax avoidance schemes and which it claims would have deprived the UK of about £200m in tax revenue.

The most recent case was heard on 30 July and concerned an investor called Nicholas Barnes, one of about 100 investors who had used a scheme to avoid £100m in tax. The investors were using what the UK court has now ruled was “a designed and marketed tax avoidance scheme” which aimed to exploit a “mismatch” between two tax regimes involving the loan of UK government bonds.

In another case, HMRC said the defendant, Howard Schofield, had spent more than £200,000 in order to set up the scheme which the UK’s Court of Appeal ruled simply “did not work”.

Schofield used the scheme shortly after selling his business in order to avoid paying capital gains tax on £10m he made when selling his business in the 2003/2004 tax year. The scheme, which was marketed by Pricewaterhouse Coopers, created an artificial loss, with the aim of Schofield therefore not having to pay tax on the profit.

The third case related to the directors of asset management company Sloane Roberts who were paid “significant bonuses”. HMRC said the directors “considered a number of tax avoidance schemes, modifying the one they had chosen when the legislation was changed to counter that type of scheme”.

However, a UK court ruled on the 16 July that this scheme did not work either. About £13m of tax was at stake.

“These wins in the courts are a victory for the vast majority of taxpayers who do not try to dodge their taxes,” said HMRC’s director general of business tax, Jim Harra.

“They send a clear message to tax avoiders – HMRC will challenge tax avoidance relentlessly and we will beat you.

“We have now had three major court successes in avoidance cases in the last month alone and I hope this sends a very clear message: These schemes don’t come cheap, you carry a serious risk that you’ll end up paying the tax and interest on top of a set-up charge which can run into the hundreds of thousands of pounds. So you have to ask yourself whether it’s really worth it.”

Tags: HMRC

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    Finance firms could face FOS complaints for unsuitable targeted support

    Industry

    FCA confirms introduction of targeted support from spring 2026

  • Industry

    FCA proposes raft of pension transfer reforms to help savers make informed decisions

    Industry

    FCA to consult on ditching insurance rules for non-UK business


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.