Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

residency certainty will come at a price

22 Sep 11

The introduction of a UK residency test will come at a price, but one worth paying, says Christopher Groves partner at international law firm Withers, which specialises in personal tax.

The introduction of a UK residency test will come at a price, but one worth paying, says Christopher Groves partner at international law firm Withers, which specialises in personal tax.

On 18 June 2011 the Treasury launched its consultation on a new statutory test for what constitutes tax residency in the UK. The new test is designed to provide certainty for taxpayers in assessing their residency treatment. While this certainty will be welcomed, it does come at a price and some of the permissiveness of the current regime will be lost. For many individuals, this will be a price worth paying. The new rules are intended to be introduced with effect from 6 April 2012.

The Safe Harbours

The effect of the new rules is firstly to introduce a number of ‘safe harbour’ guidelines within which an individual cannot be treated as tax resident in the UK. These are:
1.    for those who have not been UK resident in the previous three years, spending less than 45 days in the UK;
2.    for those who have been UK resident in the last three years, spending less than 10 days in the UK; and
3.    working abroad full time.

At the other end of the spectrum, those who spend more than 182 days in the UK or who work in the UK full time will always be treated as resident.

For those who fall in between, there will be a sliding day count scale that will determine whether an individual will be treated as UK resident depending on the number of ‘factors’ that link him to the UK. Rather than look at all an individual’s facts, there will be only five ‘factors’ that are considered under the new test.

The Factors

  1. Family – whether your spouse (or civil or unmarried partner) and minor children are UK resident.
  2. Accommodation – whether you have an ‘accessible’ home in the UK.
  3. Employment – whether you have ‘substantive’ employment in the UK (more than 45 days’ work a year).
  4. UK day count – whether you spent more than 90 days in the UK in either of the previous 2 tax years.
  5. Overall day count – whether you spend more days in the UK than your any other jurisdiction (this is only relevant for those who have been resident in the UK in the previous 3 years). 

Individuals who have been UK resident in the last 3 tax years (‘Leavers’) are treated differently to those who have not (‘Arrivers’). Leavers will have to go further to be treated as non-resident as the table below shows.

The Test Days in the Uk Leaver Arriver
Fewer than 10 Always non-resident Always non-resident
10 – 44 days Resident with 4 factors Always non-resident
45 – 89 days Resident with 3 factors Resident with 4 factors
90 – 119 days Resident with 2 factors Resident with 3 factors
120 – 182 days Resident with 1 factor Resident with 2 factors
183 days or more Always resident Always resident

Examples

So, consider a single man not previously resident in the UK. He buys a house here (1 factor) but is not employed in the UK and has not spent more than 90 days a year in the UK. As he satisfies just one factor, he could spend up to 182 days in the UK next year. The year after, he will have a second factor (the 90 day factor) and so will need to reduce his days spent in the UK to 119. If he were then to start co-habiting with a UK resident, he would have a third factor and will need to reduce his days further still to 89 if he wishes to remain non-UK resident.

By comparison, consider a married woman who wishes to cease to be UK resident before she sells her business. Her husband wishes to carry on working in the UK until he retires in a few years. Assuming she spends more time in the jurisdiction of her new home, she will satisfy 3 factors (family, accommodation and the 90 day count) and so will need to spend less than 45 days in the UK to be treated as non-UK resident.

Tags: Residency | Withers

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    SPONSORED: Real Regulation. Real Advice. Real Protection.

    Latest news

    A “best of both worlds” approach to financial fraud prevention

  • Latest news

    Pension IHT reforms will see clients and advisers face seismic shift

    Insights

    NEW: IA set to launch podcast and video series – ‘In the Loop’


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.