Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

SFO defends Weavering decision

13 Sep 11

The Serious Fraud Office has defended its decision to abandon an investigation into Weavering Capital.

The Serious Fraud Office has defended its decision to abandon an investigation into Weavering Capital.

As International Adviser reported last week, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands found two directors at the company guilty of “wilful neglect”, in relation to the collapse of the Cayman-incorporated Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund in 2009.

Stefan Peterson and Hans Ekstrom were each ordered to pay $111m in damages to the fund’s liquidators, in what was hailed as a “landmark judgement” by legal professionals.

After considering its evidence, however, the SFO concluded that there "was not a reasonable prospect of conviction."

Defending its failure to prosecute, the SFO said: “A comparison has been made by others between a court action in the Cayman Islands and the SFO decision to close its investigation.

“It should be pointed out that the Cayman Islands court action was a civil case where the burden of proof is lower than it is in a criminal prosecution. It does not follow that a ruling and award of damages in a civil action provides a certainty that a criminal case of fraud can be proved.”

Tags: Serious Fraud Office

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    VIDEO: II Awards 2025 Winners’ Stories – Gareth Maguire, Hansard

    Companies

    VIDEO: II Awards 2025 Winners’ Stories – Gareth Maguire, Hansard

  • Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.