Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

UK court opens door to pension rights for unmarried partners

By Kirsten Hastings, 8 Feb 17

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that an unmarried woman is entitled to her late partner’s occupational pension in a landmark decision that could have wider repercussions for pension schemes.

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that an unmarried woman is entitled to her late partner’s occupational pension in a landmark decision that could have wider repercussions for pension schemes.

Denise Brewster from Northern Ireland claimed that she was a victim of “serious discrimination” when she was denied access to her late partner Lenny McMullan’s pension scheme.

Brewster and McMullan had been in a relationship for 10 years and owned their own home. McMullan died suddenly at Christmas in 2009, aged 43, just two days after the couple had become engaged.

At the time of his death, McMullan had worked for the Northern Ireland public transport service for 15 years, paying into an occupational scheme administered by the Northern Ireland Local Government Officers’ Superannuation Committee (NILGOSC).

No nomination

Had they been married, Brewster would have automatically had access to the pension.

"It is totally unacceptable for cohabiting couples to be treated as second class citizens."

However, as they were co-habiting but not married, Brewster would only be entitled to the pension if she had been nominated on a form, which her partner had not done.

She initially won her case in the High Court in Northern Ireland, where a judge said that it was “irrational and disproportionate to impose a disqualifying hurdle of this kind”, reports The BBC.

However, that decision was then overturned in the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland before heading to the UK Supreme Court for a final decision.

Five Supreme Court justices unanimously ruled that Brewster is entitled to receive payments under the pension scheme, saying that the nomination form was “unlawful discrimination” because married scheme members do not have to complete a form.

Brewster’s solicitor, Gareth Mitchell, said: “Denying bereaved cohabitees access to survivor pensions causes huge distress and financial hardship. Now that around one in six families in the UK are cohabiting families, reform is long overdue,” reports Sky News.

“The decision has significant implications for millions of cohabitees in relation to pension benefits. It also lays down the approach to be adopted when considering complaints of discrimination on the grounds of marital status in other areas,” Mitchell said.

Review the rules

Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said: “[This] judgement is good news for anyone like Denise Brewster who stood to lose out on their partner’s pension, simply because a form hadn’t been signed.

“It means the Northern Ireland local government pension scheme and others covering people working in education, the NHS and the civil service will now have to look again at their rules.

“The last thing a recently bereaved person needs is to have to fight for a pension that’s rightfully theirs. This thankfully will no longer be necessary.”

Never assume

Defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) scheme members “should not make any assumptions about who will inherit [their] pension if they pass away”, warned Old Mutual Wealth’s pension expert Jon Greer.

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: Court | Pension

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

  • Europe

    Hoxton Wealth: Two overlooked measures in UK Budget that could impact expats

    Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.