Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Best and Worst US sectors during Trump’s first 100 days

By Kristen McGachey, 26 Apr 17

Trump’s first 100 days in office have been jam packed with outrageous tweets, ‘alternative facts,’ a failed healthcare bill and foreign policy blunders. But, what were the best and worst performing US sectors during Trump’s first 100 days?

Worst - 3) Financials
Gallery

12345678910

Worst - 3) Financials

Though one of the main beneficiaries of the Trump reflationary trade that kicked into gear well before he stepped foot in the Oval Office, financials have faltered in recent months as the reality of Trump’s ability to execute his political agenda sinks in.

In the first one hundred days, the sector produced total returns of -1.03%.

“Objectively it’s not a surprise that he hasn’t gotten anything done. But it has been hard for investors to be objective in the first hundred days,” said Seven Investment Management’s Ben Kumar.

Kumar, an investment manager at the firm, admitted 7IM was caught up in the frenzy of the US cyclical trade, buying small caps and other value stocks after the Donald’s victory.

“We tried following the Donald. We invested in the Russell 2000, for instance, adding to our US small-caps, which did do well at the end of 2016. However, markets translated from reflation into somewhat halting and hesitant because people weren’t ready to get on that value, cyclical train.

“That focus on buying value and cyclicals has led to us lagging a potentially more defensive approach,” he admitted, qualifying that it is also “hard to keep buying healthcare stocks at 40X earnings. If you have the luxury, you can invest in US banks or more beaten down sectors.”

Tags: Donald Trump | Investment Strategy | US

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division

  • Will inflation remain absent?

    Investment

    Bank of England set to stress test private markets

    Dr Lisa Lim

    Asia

    Rathbones AM launches new Asia ex-Japan fund


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.