Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Ex-Investec trading duo lose baseless 6m

6 Aug 14

Two former Investec traders have lost a wholly incredible and baseless £6m bonus battle to their former employer.

Two former Investec traders have lost a wholly incredible and baseless £6m bonus battle to their former employer.

Investec was handed a comprehensive victory against Andrew Brogden and Robert Reid, the former head and deputy head of its structured equity derivatives desk, who claimed they were owed an excess of £6m in bonuses for the financial year of 2010 to 2011.

The pair, who joined in 2007, alleged that the company had failed to honour an unwritten agreement which meant their bonuses were unaffected by profits and losses, protecting them from the large losses made over the period.

They said their bonuses were instead based on theoretical savings made by the bank in relation to the bond market.

However, according to Reuters, Judge George Leggatt dismissed their claims, saying: “I regard their claim that an oral agreement was made to use the ‘institutional market rate’ in calculating their bonuses as wholly incredible.”

He allegedly said that despite being convinced of the pair’s honesty and genuine belief in their claims, he could only judge what was fair in terms of contract.

The pair were also ordered to pay Investec’s £1.5m legal fees.

Investec's chief executive, London, David Van Der Walt, called the case a “baseless claim” and an “unwarranted attack on our institution, our culture and our values”.

“We operate a fair and rational bonus system which rewards those who generate returns for our stakeholders and clients,” he said. “It is unfortunate that these claims were ever issued, but we move on from here, vindicated in our approach.”

 
 

Tags: Investec

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

  • Europe

    Hoxton Wealth: Two overlooked measures in UK Budget that could impact expats

    Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.