Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Celebrity tax avoiders don’t deserve ‘pariah’ status

By Will Grahame-Clarke, 3 Sep 18

Black marks blocking UK honours not always fair

Black marks blocking UK honours not always fair

David Beckham, Gary Lineker and Robbie Williams could be among those being treated as pariahs by the establishment and overlooked for honours, a freedom of information request has revealed.

The request made by The Times newspaper has discovered a traffic light system applied to lists of prospective honours recipients.

The individuals are not named but it may explain why Beckham and Williams have received no nod to visit the palace despite achievements in sport, music and charity.

Lineker, a former England captain and top scorer, who took his team to the World Cup quarter-finals, received an OBE in 1992 but has not been elevated since.

All three have been connected to schemes which invest in films but have come under intense scrutiny from the UK taxman. 

“What is odd is that it was the government which introduced the film tax credits and other reliefs to encourage investment and then when taxpayers have taken the bait and invested in ‘approved’ schemes they get treated as if they are pariahs,” said Stephenson Harwood partner and tax expert James Quarmby told International Adviser.

“The reality is that the majority of the film schemes actually invested in British films, some of them very successful, so to argue that film partnerships are wholly abusive isn’t fair in the context.”

“Some of the schemes have been over-leveraged so as to maximise the reliefs, but others have not. Focus has often been on the non-recourse loans from the banks, but banks aren’t charities so they will only lend on commercial terms.”

Last week, leading film tax scheme specialist Ingenious Media said it would appeal a £47.3m ($60.9m, €52.4m) plus interest fine from HM Revenue and Customs, which says the scheme is abusive.

Tags: Ingenious

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    Skybound Wealth hires group head of tax planning

    Latest news

    Blacktower’s John Westwood: Will Budget reform prove counterproductive?

  • Latest news

    ‘Expats need perspective not panic’: AES International’s strategies for surviving the UK Budget

    rachel-reeves

    Investment

    Utmost Wealth warns UK chancellor Reeves not to underestimate “internationally mobile” wealthy


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.