Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Asset managers ‘subsidising’ own funds as fee pressures bite

25 May 17

Asset managers have been forced to subsidise their own funds in order to keep fees low despite soaring costs, research from Fitz Partners has revealed.

Asset managers have been forced to subsidise their own funds in order to keep fees low despite soaring costs, research from Fitz Partners has revealed.

The study of cross-border fund charges conducted by the London-based research company found 79% of asset managers subsidise their own funds to keep total charges under control, as pressure has grown to cap fees to remain competitive.

Nearly a fifth of those subsidising their funds were covering expenses that significantly exceeded the management fee.

Smaller funds experience the biggest pressure on fees with both retail and institutional funds of less than $10m (£7.7m, €8.9m) reporting operating costs that were more than double the charges.

For example, an average institutional fund valued at less than $10m would charge around 1% OCF, but would be subsidised a further 2% by the manager to cover costs.

Larger funds of more than $100m were evidence economies of scale worked in their favour with a minimal subsidy needed, if any at all, as charges covered most costs.

 

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: Fees | Investment Management

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division

    How to save the pan European pension dream

    Industry

    Quilter Cheviot launches tailored discretionary decumulation offering

  • Companies

    Crédit Agricole wealth management arm acquires wealth tech firm

    Businessman works on laptop Showing business analytics dashboard with charts, metrics, and KPI to analyze performance and create insight reports for operations management. Data analysis concept.Ai

    Companies

    Parmenion partners with Mabel Insights to roll out portfolio analysis tools for advisers


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.