Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Back to basics: life insurance key part of financial planning

By Kirsten Hastings, 1 Sep 17

IHT planning, nil rate bands and replacing pension scheme death benefits are some of the reasons life insurance needs to remain a core part of financial planning, according to Chris Lean, a chartered financial planner with Aisa International. Click through the slides below to see six key reasons advisers need to speak to clients about ensuring they are protected.

Replace pension scheme death benefits - without losing pension guarantees
Gallery

123456

Replace pension scheme death benefits - without losing pension guarantees

Many thousands of people with deferred occupational pension benefits will have had up to four times their salary as death in service benefits while they were employed. Once they move on, however, the cover stops and is often not replaced.

For those with deferred pensions in defined benefit (DB) schemes the pension payable upon the death of a deferred member to the spouse is usually 50% to 67% of the accrued pension.

People might choose to transfer these pensions so that the cash equivalent transfer value and future growth is available to the family, believing this to be more important than the pension guaranteed.

However, for a large proportion of these cases, moving benefits from a final salary scheme is going to mean a reduced income in retirement and additional risks and costs.

In the majority of cases, it would be far more cost effective to maintain the final salary scheme benefits and purchase a simple life policy. Thus ensuring the shorter-term needs of the family are catered for, as well as the longer term needs at retirement.

Tags: Aisa Group | IHT | Nil Rate Band | Pension

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Founder of giant EU adviser training body ‘undimmed’ by Brexit

    Latest news

    Three quarters of advisers seeking support with onshore investment bonds

    Industry

    AILO names Guy Vanner as new CEO as Bob Pain retires

  • Latest news

    Advisers ramping up usage of onshore investment bonds, Chesnara Life research shows

    Best Practice

    Why fiduciary duty isn’t optional (even when it feels inconvenient)


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.