Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Cryptocurrencies ‘akin’ to Ponzi schemes, says India regulator

By Robbie Lawther, 15 Feb 22

‘They threaten the financial sovereignty of a country’

The Indian government started plans to ban private cryptocurrencies in November 2021 and now its reserve bank has slammed the asset class.

Shri Rabi Sankar, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), said in a speech on 14 February 2022, that “crypto-technology is underpinned by a philosophy to evade government controls”.

He added: “Cryptocurrencies have specifically been developed to bypass the regulated financial system. These should be reason enough to treat them with caution.

“We have also seen that cryptocurrencies are not amenable to definition as a currency, asset or commodity; they have no underlying cash flows, they have no intrinsic value; that they are akin to Ponzi schemes and may even be worse.

“These should be reason enough to keep them away from the formal financial system. Additionally, they undermine financial integrity, especially the KYC regime and AML/CFT regulations and at least potentially facilitate anti-social activities.”

‘Wreck currency system’

But November’s parliamentary bill, which seeks to ban private cryptocurrencies, also aimed to “create a facilitative framework for the creation of the official digital currency”.

Sankar added: “More substantially, they can, and if allowed most likely will, wreck the currency system, the monetary authority, the banking system, and in general government’s ability to control the economy.

“They threaten the financial sovereignty of a country and make it susceptible to strategic manipulation by private corporates creating these currencies or governments that control them.

“All these factors lead to the conclusion that banning cryptocurrency is perhaps the most advisable choice open to India.

“We have examined the arguments proffered by those advocating that cryptocurrencies should be regulated and found that none of them stand up to basic scrutiny.”

Tags: Cryptocurrency | India | Ponzi Scheme

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Skybound Wealth launches Plume into Athletes & Creators division

    Avaloq and BTA Finance deal.

    Industry

    Brooks Macdonald appointed official wealth management partner of BAFTA

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    Companies

    VIDEO: II Awards 2025 Winners’ Stories – Gareth Maguire, Hansard


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.