Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Europe lagging in sustainable investment

By Kirsten Hastings, 28 Sep 17

Investors in Europe are falling behind the global average when it comes to sustainable investing, according to a survey from Schroders.

Globally, investors see sustainable investing as a way to drive not only societal, social and environmental change, but also profit.

Schroders surveyed 22,000 investors across 30 countries and found that sustainable investing was the top investment topic of which most people would like to improve their knowledge.

Investors are also putting their money where their mouths are and allocating increasing sums to sustainable investments.

However, this trend appears to be stronger in Asia and the Americas than in Europe, as demonstrated in the table below:

Impact or profit

When asked if they invested in sustainable funds for positive impact or potential profit, the average response across all fund types showed that positive impact had a greater importance (38%) than profit (32%).

The two fund types that bucked the global trend, with profit scoring higher or the same as positive impact were:

  • Funds focusing on corporate governance was more likely to be for profit than for positive impact (37% vs 30%); and,
  • Investing in medical science and biotechnology funds showed equal weighting between positive impact and profitability (36% vs 36%).

In contrast, investors scored the following funds higher on the positive impact:

  • Positive social impact funds such as human rights, poverty and social welfare (46% positive social impact vs 25% profitability);
  • Funds that invest in green technologies (43% positive social impact vs 31/5 profitability);
  • Funds that avoid oil, gas or coal companies (37% positive social impact vs 31% profitability);
  • Funds focused on improving diversity (34% positive social impact vs 32% profitability).

Strong interest in surprising areas

Jessica Ground, Global Head of Stewardship at Schroders, said: “It is extremely encouraging for us to see sustainable investing is on the rise.

“While profitability remains the central investment consideration, interest in sustainability is increasing – and is especially strong in some surprising areas. But investors also see sustainability and profits as intertwined.  They are looking to allocate to companies that are successfully navigating social and environmental change to generate profit and impact.

“Investors understand the impact that issues such as strong corporate governance and diversity can have in generating profits – views that are backed up by the research.

“Social and environmental change is happening faster than ever. The challenges posed by climate change, inequality and demographics are sizeable. Our Study shows that investors are willing to play a role and value the impact that investments in green technology and social impact can have.“

Geographical differences

The adoption of sustainable behaviours, such as recycling, and reducing energy, and popularity of sustainable investing differs between countries.

Schroders has created a sustainability ranking based on an average score of the questions it posed to investors. Indonesia topped the ranking, with India second and the US third. At the bottom of the list were Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan.

 

Tags: ESG | Schroders

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Europe

    Hoxton Wealth: Two overlooked measures in UK Budget that could impact expats

    Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  

  • Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division

    Will inflation remain absent?

    Investment

    Bank of England set to stress test private markets


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.