Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

HMRC rejects film industry tax avoidance criticism

By Kirsten Hastings, 27 Feb 17

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has rejected criticism over how it has handled the exploitation of tax breaks for the film industry, which Treasury chairman Andrew Tyrie claims has been “financially calamitous” for some investors.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has rejected criticism over how it has handled the exploitation of tax breaks for the film industry, which Treasury chairman Andrew Tyrie claims has been “financially calamitous” for some investors.

Film schemes

HMRC has declared victory over several film schemes over the past few years.

One example being the Eclipse schemes, originally designed by HSBC, boasted investors such as Sir Alex Ferguson and Sven-Goran Erikson.

Eclipse paid £503m to acquire the distribution rights to the Disney films which it then immediately sold to another member of the Disney Group for a payment of £1.02bn spread over a 20-year period – an arrangement HMRC described as “a sophisticated financial model”.

Around 780 investors poured £2.2bn ($2.7bn, €2.6bn) into the schemes.  

Eclipse came to the attention of HMRC after it found that the partnership had not conducted any trades, which is a prerequisite to qualifying for any tax relief.

The UK taxman and Eclipse partnership have been locked in a prolonged appeals battle, which eventually landed at the Supreme Court in April 2016. The court quashed Eclipse’s final appeal in April, which means no further appeals can be brought.

Payment demands were expected to be sent to investors in early 2017, with requests for the repayment of any tax relief plus an additional liability related to the income tax paid on the income of the film production company.

This could see investors with a £200,000 initial investment hit with a tax bill of £2m or higher.

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: Film Scheme | HMRC | Tax Avoidance

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Avaloq and BTA Finance deal.

    Industry

    Brooks Macdonald appointed official wealth management partner of BAFTA

    Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

  • Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

    Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.