Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

jersey fsc publishes implementation details

6 Dec 13

Jersey’s financial regulator has published details of how it expects the island’s financial advisory industry to go about complying with changes proposed under its Review of Financial Advice (RFA) project, first unveiled in 2011.

Jersey’s financial regulator has published details of how it expects the island’s financial advisory industry to go about complying with changes proposed under its Review of Financial Advice (RFA) project, first unveiled in 2011.

In a statement on its website, the Jersey Financial Services Commission noted that although the implementation date for the changes to its regulatory requirements,  outlined in September following a consultation,  “has remained 1 January 2014”, island companies will have an extra six-month “transitional period” during which they may get up to speed with a package of other changes.

These other changes consist of amendments to seven Codes of Practice for Investment Businesses (IB Codes), which were not part of the RFA, and which were set out in a consultation paper in 2011.

“The Commission is aware that to give full effect to the amendments proposed to the [IB Codes], a number of registered persons may need to amend their client terms and conditions,” the JFSC said, explaining why it had decided to cut island investment businesses some slack in three areas.

These areas are:

  • A "registered person" – that is, someone who is registered by the JFSC to carry out trust company business – will be required to "classify" only those clients who fall under the JFSC's definition of Class C and Class D investment business clients;
  • With respect to the criteria that must be meet before a registered person may consider a client to be a "professional" client, the registered person must form an opinion based on the “transaction or services envisaged”, rather than the recently-consulted-on IB Codes, which referred to “services to be provided and transactions to be concluded”;
  • The client classification, QCF Level 4 professional qualification, and amended remuneration requirements set down in the IB Codes will only need to be applied in those instances in which a registered person provides investment advice.

As reported, the RFA was conceived in the wake of  the UK’s Retail Distribution Review (RDR), a package of regulatory reforms governing the way financial advice in the UK is provided and paid for, which took effect on 1 Jan 2013.

The JFSC unveiled the results of its RFA consultation in November 2012, less than a week after Guernsey – Jersey’s English Channel neighbour and sometime rival – launched a consultation of its own, on whether it should adopt an RDR-type review similar to the UK's.

The Isle of Man is also implementing a version of RDR in the New Year, which like Jersey's RFA, focuses on raising the standards of advisers' qualifications. The Isle of Man regulations do not involve commission restrictions, according to  IoM director of financial services John Spellman.

Last year, Jersey wealth managers told International Adviser that they and their rivals on the island were unlikely to have a problem meeting the deadline for complying with the JFSC's new regulations, because , Jersey's advisory industry has been moving for some time in the direction of higher qualifications, and away from the use of commissions.

To read or download the JFSC's Feedback Paper on the RFA, click here.

Tags: Jersey | RDR

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members

    Guernsey flag

    Industry

    Guernsey financial regulator to increase fees by 3.9%

  • Europe

    Hoxton Wealth: Two overlooked measures in UK Budget that could impact expats

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.