Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Best and Worst US sectors during Trump’s first 100 days

By Kristen McGachey, 26 Apr 17

Trump’s first 100 days in office have been jam packed with outrageous tweets, ‘alternative facts,’ a failed healthcare bill and foreign policy blunders. But, what were the best and worst performing US sectors during Trump’s first 100 days?

Worst - 1) Energy
Gallery

12345678910

Worst - 1) Energy

Ironically, the sector that Trumped talked up the most on the campaign trail, and has made some of the most controversial decisions regarding during his first 100 days, was the weakest performer over the period.

Despite stuffing his cabinet with something names in the oil industry, like ex-Ceo of Exxon Mobil Rex Tillerson, and signing off on pro-energy executive orders like the construction of the Keystone Pipeline, the S&P 500’s oil & gas segment has yielded negative total returns of 11.29.

There’s a simple explanation for this outcome, said Canaccord’s Perera. As oil production in the US ramps up, prices go down.

“His impact has been more on the balance of trade of the US not having such a big energy deficit. But from the point of view of the energy companies themselves, I’m not sure they’ve benefited from deregulation.”

And with other countries reticent to limit their levels of production, US energy self-sufficiency “will likely keep global prices capped,” added Brooks Macdonald investment committee director Edward Park.

“We note that investors are questioning the OPEC cartel’s ability to support prices through production cuts, while global oil inventories continue to expand,” he said.

   

Tags: Donald Trump | Investment Strategy | US

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Why AES International is attracting the next generation of financial advisers  

    Industry

    Skybound Wealth unveils dedicated cross-border support desk within Athletes & Creators division

  • Will inflation remain absent?

    Investment

    Bank of England set to stress test private markets

    Dr Lisa Lim

    Asia

    Rathbones AM launches new Asia ex-Japan fund


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.