Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

UK pension advice company fails

By Robbie Lawther, 16 Mar 23

After the firm entered compulsory liquidation in January 2023

Google bans cryptocurrency ads in high-risk product crackdown

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) declared financial advice firm Portal Financial Services in default on 15 March 2023.

This comes after the firm, formerly named Portafina, entered compulsory liquidation on 18 January 2023 – following a petition to wind up was sent to the high court on 9 January 2023.

Portal Financial Services became authorised in 2009. According to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) register, the firm applied to cancel its permissions on 18 June 2021.

The FSCS said in a statement that Portal is one of the firms “associated with claims regarding the British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) and also defined benefit transfer advice related to other occupational pension schemes”.

The UK lifeboat scheme told International Adviser that there are currently 291 claims against the firm, one successfully upheld and two that have been rejected. Some 288 are being processed.

The majority of claims are pension transfer advice related with a very small number of these being BSPS-related.

Court case

In March 2022, Portal Financial Services was blocked from challenging a number of decisions made by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in relation to pension transfers.

The firm took the FOS to the high court arguing that it was not partially responsible for client losses after they were advised to invest a portion of their pension pots in high-risk, unregulated collective investment schemes (Ucis). Justice Sweeting rejected Portal’s grounds for a challenge.

Clients were introduced to Portal by a third-party advisory firm, Cherish Wealth Management, which was the appointed representative of Shah Wealth Management, a financial advisory firm authorised by the FCA which did not have permissions to advise on pension transfers.

Cherish clients were referred to Portal to determine their suitability to transfer their existing pension arrangements under one or more occupational or personal pension schemes into a self-invested personal pension (Sipp).

Portal’s pension transfer advice was sent to clients as a written ‘suitability report’. Cherish provided further advice on the investments to be held in the Sipp wrapper to all but one of the clients involved, the high court said.

Without Portal’s knowledge, they were advised to invest a portion of their pension pot in high-risk Ucis and have suffered losses as a result.

Both Shah and Cherish commenced winding up on 5 July 2016. Clients made complaints to the FOS in relation to the transfer advice given by Portal.

In summary, the FOS ruled against Portal on the grounds that:

  • It was not entitled to “divorce” the advice on the suitability of the pension transfer from considering the suitability of the underlying investments – or to rely on Cherish doing so;
  • It failed in its primary duty to properly advise on the suitability of the transfer; and
  • Although, Cherish “may also have separately caused” some of the client’s losses, Portal should nonetheless be responsible for 100% of the loss.

Failed firms

Since the start of the year, 21 advice firms have failed – with now two companies under investigation with the FSCS.

The most recent firm declared in default was The London Trading Company Ltd on 10 March 2023.

Tags: British Steel | FCA | FSCS | Pension Transfers

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Companies

    Skybound Wealth launches Plume into Athletes & Creators division

    Avaloq and BTA Finance deal.

    Industry

    Brooks Macdonald appointed official wealth management partner of BAFTA

  • Companies

    Premier Miton appoints new NED and chair to succeed Robert Colthorpe

    Latest news

    UK government confirms pre-1997 indexation for PPF members


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.